A few observations here (and this should not surprise anyone who has read word one about the flaws in the NCTQ ratings of programs in COEs across the country):
1. In order to be acceptable, the text must address the five components of scientifically proven effective instruction (i.e., phonics, etc.).
2. These are books for early reading instruction and, apparently, middle school, tweens, etc. do not matter.
3. From the many pages of texts, only a handful are deemed acceptable.
I feel sort of happy that I am not acceptable given the criteria NCTQ uses. However, I am bothered a little by the use of the term NOT RELEVANT given to NAKED READING. But since it is sitting on the same PD shelf as so many others, I guess I should feel honored. If anyone had a doubt about the agenda of this "report," those should now be put to rest. How sad that IN THE MIDDLE and THE BOOK WHISPERER and YELLOW BRICK ROADS are considered irrelevant. I hope that their appearance on this list will spur folks (as I am spurred when a book lands on the censored list) to buy some more copies and pass them around. They are relevant; they will remain relevant as long as we have as our goal this: we want to create lifelong learners. Now, I think I shall go and reread my Kindle copy of THE BOOK WHISPERER. Not relevant. Ha!