i wonder why people who read the CCSS document come away thinking that there is a set percentage of NF versus fiction selections?
I wonder where the research base for the anchor standards is hidden in CCSS?
I wonder why more people are not talking about the exemplar texts?
I wonder where the PD for content folks is originating since CCSS indicates they are expected to include emphasis on NF and reading?
I wonder how folks from outside the field of juvenile literature are suddenly experts?
I wonder why our professional organizations are not speaking out against some of the insanities I am seeing associated with CCSS (let's begin with model frameworks, the first of which had a spelling error in it)?
I wonder why such emphasis is placed on using formulae applied to a creative product in an attempt to "measure" it (ATOS, LEXILE, etc.) as if such a thing is possible?
There are other things I wonder, but a wonder-full stack of books is calling me.