The post went on to question the profanity of the books she had read (I assumed she had read at least part of the book or books) and why authors felt it was necessary to use profanity. In her opinion, profanity is never appropriate (though she will concede to some mild profanity if absolutely needed). She basically indicated she would not want books with profanity as books she would offer her students.
Now, I have no idea if she works in an elementary or middle or high school. I have no idea which words might be acceptable and under what conditions. What I wonder if what books she read during her MLS coursework. And which books she might have read in the past years (decades?)? I suspect I know the answer to these questions. I have a feeling she is not well read at all. And this makes me deeply sad, sad for her and especially sad for her students. She is a gatekeeper and a censor. And she is a librarian.
I did not leave a comment. I had the distinct feeling it would fall on deaf ears. But now I know I have to go back and find that post and leave a comment of some kind. That post flies in the face of what educators need to do. We need to read, read widely and read deeply. And we need to share those books with kids without the judgmental remarks about profanity or any other "issue" we might have with the book. It also flies in the face of what I teach in literature classes about censorship and selection and gatekeeping.
We have to SpeakLoudly against censorship and gatekeeping. We have to point to those who would challenge books, ban books, fail to purchase books because they are offended by profanity or other content they deem inappropriate. It is our duty to raise the alarm. SpeakLoudly.